Effect of State Food Stamp and TANF Policies on Food Stamp Program Participation

• 查看报告

英文名称：

Effect of State Food Stamp and TANF Policies on Food Stamp Program Participation

作者：

Caroline Ratcliffe""url":0; Signe-Mary McKernan""url":0; Kenneth Finegold""url":0;

来源地址：

https://www.ers.usda.gov/api/publications/v1.0?page=37&items_per_page=20&sort_by=releaseDate&sort_order=DESC&series=AP%2CCCR%2CEB%2CEIB%2CERR%2CTB

关键词：

Food stamps;  Government policy;  United States;  Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program;  participation;  nutrition policy; 

年份：

2008

出版地：

Washington, DC, USA

总页数：

52

语种：

English

摘要：

The effectiveness of the Food Stamp Program (FSP) depends on the extent to which it reaches those who are entitled to benefits. In the mid- to late 1990s, participation fell sharply. In recent years, it rebounded somewhat, reaching 65.1 percent in 2005. Changes in participation patterns can be attributed partly to economic fluctuations, but they were also shaped by the rapidly changing State policy environment. This study combines data from the Survey of Income and Program Participation, 1996-2003, with data on State-level food stamp, welfare, minimum wage, and Earned Income Tax Credit policy to investigate the effects of policy on food stamp participation. The findings show strong evidence that some FSP policy reforms made after 1999 (such as more lenient vehicle-exemption policies, longer recertification periods, and expanded categorical eligibility) increased food stamp participation. The use of biometric technology, such as fingerprinting, however, lowered participation. The study shows less consistent evidence that more lenient immigrant eligibility rules, simplified reporting, Electronic Benefit Transfers, or outreach spending raised food stamp participation.This study was conducted by The Urban Institute under a cooperative research contract with USDA’s Economic Research Service (ERS) Food and Nutrition Assistance Research Program (FANRP): contract number 43-3AEM-3-80085 (ERS project representative: Margaret Andrews). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of ERS or USDA.