Governance for Quality in Higher Education in Odisha, India

• 查看报告

作者：

World Bank Group

来源地址：

http://hdl.handle.net/10986/22943

关键词：

EMPLOYMENT;  AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH;  COLLEGE;  COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES;  CAREER GUIDANCE;  PRIVATE HIGHER EDUCATION;  TEACHERS;  STUDENT INTAKE;  ACADEMIC STAFF;  CAREER DEVELOPMENT;  INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;  ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE;  TUITION;  GRADUATE LEVEL;  UNIVERSITY COLLEGE;  SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY;  CAREER;  HIGHER EDUCATION;  UNIVERSITY GRANTS;  PAPERS;  GRADUATE PROGRAMS;  REGULAR CURRICULUM;  COLLEGES;  DISCIPLINES;  ACADEMIC RESEARCH;  PROFESSOR;  GRADUATE UNEMPLOYMENT;  STATE UNIVERSITIES;  EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION;  QUALITY TEACHING;  HIGHER EDUCATION SECTOR;  FACULTY;  PROFESSORS;  QUALITY OF HIGHER EDUCATION;  LITERACY;  EDUCATION SECTOR;  PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES;  TECHNICAL TRAINING;  DEGREE PROGRAMS;  RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES;  COURSE CONTENT;  PRIVATE UNIVERSITY;  HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT;  QUALIFIED ACADEMIC STAFF;  CURRICULUM EXPERTS;  REGULAR CLASSROOM;  TRAINING;  GRADUATE;  ACCESS TO HIGHER EDUCATION;  COLLEGE LEVEL;  EDUCATION DEPARTMENT;  HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS;  MINISTRIES;  SCHOLARS;  JOB MARKET;  QUALITY HIGHER EDUCATION;  LEARNING;  GRADUATES;  RESEARCH;  UNIVERSITY FACULTY;  TEACHING;  GRANTS;  GRADUATE STUDIES;  HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEMS;  PRIVATE HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS;  EDUCATION SYSTEMS;  COLLEGE EDUCATION;  HUMAN CAPITAL;  WORKERS;  STUDENT POPULATION;  SCIENCE;  UNIVERSITY LEVEL;  BACKGROUND PAPERS;  TUITION FEES;  CURRICULUM DESIGN;  STUDENT;  SCHOOLS;  KNOWLEDGE BASE;  LEARNING OUTCOMES;  LIFELONG LEARNING;  SCIENCE FACULTIES;  PRIVATE UNIVERSITIES;  FACULTIES;  LABOUR MARKET;  KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY;  RESEARCHERS;  EXPENDITURES;  ACADEMIC COUNCILS;  ACADEMIC AUTONOMY;  EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS;  APPLIED RESEARCH;  CAREERS;  RESEARCH FUNDING;  QUALIFIED TEACHERS;  QUALITY ASSESSMENT;  TEACHER DEPLOYMENT;  RESEARCH INSTITUTES;  STAFF SALARIES;  CURRICULUM;  TEACHER;  STUDENT ENROLMENTS;  ACCREDITATION;  FACULTY MEMBERS;  TERTIARY LEVEL;  SYLLABI;  CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT;  UNIVERSITY TEACHERS;  INSTITUTES;  PRIVATE INSTITUTIONS;  DEGREE COURSES;  HUMAN RESOURCES;  RESEARCH GRANTS;  COLLEGE TEACHERS;  RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT;  PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT;  RESEARCH FINDINGS;  COLLEGE GRADUATES;  PRIVATE COLLEGES;  UNIVERSITY;  STUDENTS;  HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM;  ACADEMIC FREEDOM;  TECHNICAL EDUCATION;  QUALITY ASSURANCE;  TEACHER-STUDENT RATIO;  DEGREES;  SCHOOL;  CIVIL SERVICE;  SECONDARY EDUCATION;  FACULTY DEVELOPMENT;  GRADUATE STUDENTS;  TERTIARY EDUCATION;  TRAINING FUNDS;  ACADEMIC YEAR;  UNIVERSITIES;  COLLEGE MANAGEMENT;  HUMAN DEVELOPMENT;  Report;  Rapport;  Informe; 

年份：

2015

出版地：

Washington,USA

语种：

English

摘要：

The rise of the global economy, where social and economic development are driven by knowledge coupled with the information and technology revolution, signifies that tertiary education everywhere cannot continue with business as usual. The hope is that by creating, applying and disseminating new ideas and technologies to greater numbers, higher education systems will graduate a skilled, flexible and productive work force. The scope of the study includes primarily the governance and management system across the Higher Education (HE) sector in Odisha; the current Quality Assurance System (QAS) including affiliation and accreditation and the inter-relationship between QAS and HE governance system; issues associated with autonomy in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in Odisha; the existing policy and legal environment in view of systemic transformation of governance for excellence; and international experience of good practices of governance and management system focusing on quality assurance. This paper aims: to describe and analyze the state of governance in Odisha higher education with special focus on the role of the higher education department of the GoO, university management, college management and the relationship between these structures; to analyze and re-examine the concept of increased autonomy for HEIs in Odisha; and to make recommendations on how to improve efficiency, effectiveness and accountability for increased autonomy in higher education governance.