Toward a Clean World for All : An IEG Evaluation of the World Bank Group’s Support to Pollution Management

• 查看报告

作者：

Independent Evaluation Group

来源地址：

http://hdl.handle.net/10986/28957

关键词：

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH;  ENVIRONMENTALLY SUSTAINABLE GROWTH;  POLLUTION MANAGEMENT;  ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT;  ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES;  NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT;  BROWN ISSUES AND HEALTH;  ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGY;  NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT;  ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT;  POLLUTION MANAGEMENT &;  CONTROL;  GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT;  ENVIRONMENT AND HEALTH;  NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT AND RURAL ISSUES;  ENVIRONMENT;  HEALTH;  NUTRITION AND POPULATION;  RURAL DEVELOPMENT;  AIR POLLUTION;  WATER POLLUTION;  HOUSEHOLD AIR POLLUTION;  AMBIENT AIR POLLUTION;  WASTE MANAGEMENT;  WASTE DISPOSAL;  CLIMATE CHANGE;  SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT;  WATER TREATMENT;  POLLUTION MONITORING;  POLLUTION-ABATING INVESTMENTS;  COUNTRY STRATEGIES;  SYSTEMATIC COUNTRY DIAGNOSTICS;  POLLUTION THREATS;  LEAD;  CHROMIUM;  E-WASTE;  COUNTRY ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS;  CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION PORTFOLIO;  GREENHOUSE GAS REDUCTION;  AIR EMISSIONS;  WASTE WATER;  IFC ADVISORY SUPPORT;  IFC CLIENT COMPANIES;  Report;  Rapport;  Informe; 

年份：

2017

出版地：

Washington,USA

语种：

English

摘要：

This evaluation is the first comprehensive assessment of World Bank Group's multisectoral engagement in pollution management with 534 projects and US$34 billion commitment during FY04-17. It finds that the Bank Group has made significant progress in improving pollution management in client countries although important gaps remain. World Bank efforts to set up country-level pollution monitoring systems have been relatively rare, despite a recent surge. Pollution does not get adequately prioritized in country strategies. The Bank's Country Environmental Analyses have been instrumental in prioritizing pollution in policy dialogue. Yet, they have only been prepared for 42 countries (28 percent of client countries) and the extent in which those country strategies reflect identified pollution concerns is limited. Overall, the magnitude of the Bank Group's engagement has declined as a share of the overall portfolio even as global pollution levels have risen. It has also missed opportunities to fight indoor and outdoor air pollution, which are responsible for the highest share of deaths caused by pollution. The Bank Group's climate change mitigation portfolio provides an opportunity to address outdoor air pollution, helping to build the case to client countries justifying such interventions that yield co-benefits: pollution and greenhouse gas reduction. About one-third of IFC client companies do not meet the relevant requirements for air emissions and wastewater. IEG recommends strengthening monitoring efforts, strengthening country analytical work to ensure a more comprehensive integration to the identified pollution priorities in the SCDs and subsequent CPFs, scaling up and recalibrating the World Bank's support in pollution management, leveraging its climate change portfolio to better combat local and regional air pollution, and strengthening IFC's advisory support to help its investment clients better comply with pollution requirements.