筛选
科学数据
统计数据
共检索到37条 ,权限内显示50条;
Data from: Gender differences in patterns of authorship do not affect peer review outcomes at an ecology journal
- 负责人：
- DOI：
- doi:10.5061/dryad.0mv3q
- 摘要：
- There is a widespread perception in the academic community that peer review is subject to many biases and can be influenced by the identity
Data from: Imbalance in individual researcher’s peer review activities quantified for four British Ecological Society Journals, 2003-2010
- 负责人：
- 关键词：
- DOI：
- doi:10.5061/dryad.36r69
- 摘要：
- Researchers contribute to the scientific peer review system by providing reviews, and “withdraw” from it by submitting manuscripts that ar
Data from: Gender differences in peer review outcomes and manuscript impact at six journals of ecology and evolution
- 负责人：
- Fox, Charles W.
- DOI：
- doi:10.5061/dryad.7p048mk
- 摘要：
- ences in peer review outcomes were observed in a survey of >12,000 published manuscripts; women reported similar rates of rejection (from a prior journal
Data from: Editor and reviewer gender influence the peer review process but not peer review outcomes at an ecology journal
- 负责人：
- DOI：
- doi:10.5061/dryad.5090r
- 摘要：
- Lack of diversity on editorial boards might generate disparities in editorial and peer review that contribute to gender and geographic disparities
Data from: Author-suggested reviewers: gender differences and influences on the peer review process at an ecology journal
- 负责人：
- DOI：
- doi:10.5061/dryad.37312
- 摘要：
- Peer review is the primary method by which journals evaluate the quality and importance of scientific papers. To help editors find suitable reviewer
Data from: Recruitment of reviewers is becoming harder at some journals: a test of the influence of reviewer fatigue at six journals
- 负责人：
- Fox, Charles W.
- DOI：
- doi:10.5061/dryad.2jr8p
- 摘要：
- Background: It is commonly reported by editors that it has become harder to recruit reviewers for peer review and that this is because individuals ar
Data from: Gender diversity of editorial boards and gender differences in the peer review process at six journals of ecology and evolution.
- 负责人：
- DOI：
- doi:10.5061/dryad.0k6djh9wc
- 摘要：
- for the other two), and how several aspects of the peer review process differed between female and male editors and reviewers. We found that, for five of the si
Data from: A critical evaluation of the volume, relevance and quality of evidence submitted by the tobacco industry to oppose standardised packaging
- 负责人：
- DOI：
- doi:10.5061/dryad.7dm1p
- 摘要：
- . Outcome measures: The volume, relevance (subject matter) and quality (as measured by independence from industry and peer-review) of evidence cited by TTCs
Data from: Is it becoming harder to secure reviewers for peer review? A test with data from five ecology journals
- 负责人：
- Vines, Timothy H.
- DOI：
- doi:10.5061/dryad.3539k
- 摘要：
- Background: There is concern in the academic publishing community that it is becoming more difficult to secure reviews for peer-reviewed manuscripts
Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors
- 负责人：
- DOI：
- doi:10.5063/aa/xhan.4.1
- 摘要：
- Double-blind peer review, in which neither author nor reviewer are identified, is rarely practised in ecology or evolution journals. Most journals
