Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors

负责人：

关键词：

Gender bias Publication bias Double blind review Females

DOI：

doi:10.5063/aa/xhan.4.1

摘要：

Double-blind peer review, in which neither author nor reviewer are identified, is rarely practised in ecology or evolution journals. Most journals

Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors

负责人：

关键词：

Gender bias Publication bias Double blind review Females

DOI：

doi:10.5063/aa/xhan.4.5

摘要：

Double-blind peer review, in which neither author nor reviewer are identified, is rarely practised in ecology or evolution journals. Most journals

Data from: Publication and reporting of clinical trial results: cross sectional analysis across academic medical centers

负责人：

关键词：

DOI：

doi:10.5061/dryad.6n018

摘要：

ng the Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov database and manual review, we identified all interventional clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov

Data from: Risk factors for suicidality in Huntington's disease: an analysis of the 2CARE clinical trial

负责人：

关键词：

164 Huntington's disease;Suicidality;Huntington's disease;All Clinical trials; 19 All Clinical trials

DOI：

doi:10.5061/dryad.2hp4hq3

摘要：

Most suicidality literature in HD is based on natural history studies or retrospective reviews, but reports on risk factors from clinical trials ar