Linking Risk and Economic Assessments in the Analysis of Plant Pest Regulations: The Case of U.S. Imports of Mexican Avocados

• 查看报告

英文名称：

Linking Risk and Economic Assessments in the Analysis of Plant Pest Regulations: The Case of U.S. Imports of Mexican Avocados

作者：

Everett E. Petersen""url":0; David Orden""url":0;

来源地址：

https://www.ers.usda.gov/api/publications/v1.0?page=40&items_per_page=20&sort_by=releaseDate&sort_order=DESC&series=AP%2CCCR%2CEB%2CEIB%2CERR%2CTB

关键词：

avocado;  risk assessment;  invasive species;  phytosanitary regulation;  trade;  Mexico; 

年份：

2006

出版地：

Washington, DC, USA

总页数：

61

语种：

English

摘要：

This study compares the effects of importing fresh Mexican Hass avocados into the United States under three sce-narios for mitigating pest risks. The analysis finds that Scenario 1, adherence to the U.S. phytosanitary rule of November 2004\u2014which removed all seasonal and geographic restrictions on Mexican avocados, while maintaining existing compliance procedures in Mexico\u2014leads to low pest risks for U.S. producers and an estimated annual U.S. welfare gain of $72 million. In Scenario 2, if compliance measures specific to fruit fly control are eliminated along with seasonal and geographic restrictions, pest risks for U.S. producers remain low and there is an additional gain in net U.S. welfare of $1.7 million. Results for Scenario 3, which eliminates all control measures in Mexico, depends on the level of pest-risk estimated. With average risk, there is a gain in net U.S. welfare of about $8.5 mil-lion compared with eliminating only seasonal and geographic restrictions, but U.S. producers incur significant pest control costs. With maximum pest-risk estimates, the net gain in U.S. welfare is $16.2 million less than if only geographic and seasonal restrictions are eliminated, with larger pest control costs for U.S. producers and lower consumer welfare gains due to pest-related losses of U.S. avocados. This study was conducted by the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University under a cooperative research contract with USDA’s Economic Research Service (ERS) Program of Research on the Economics of Invasive Species Management (PREISM): contract number 43-3AEM-3-80087 (ERS project representative: Donna Roberts). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of ERS or USDA.