您的位置： 首页 > 特色资源 > 特色资源列表页 > 资源详情
Classifying and Measuring Agricultural Support: Identifying Differences Between the WTO and OECD Systems
- 英文名称：
- Classifying and Measuring Agricultural Support: Identifying Differences Between the WTO and OECD Systems
- 作者：
- Anne Effl;
- 工作单位：
- USDA's Economic Research Service
- 关键词：
- Domestic support measurement; US agricultural policy; WTO; Aggregate measurement of support (AMS); Green box; Amber box; OECD; Producer support estimate (PSE); Consumer support estimate (CSE); General services support estimate (GSSE);
- 年份：
- 2011
- 出版地：
- Washington, DC, USA
- 总页数：
- 24 pp
- 语种：
- English
- 摘要：
- Most countries provide some level of support to their agricultural sectors. Because support can affect producers and consumers in other countries, a number of systems have been developed to measure agricultural support levels and classify types of support in ways that facilitate comparing them across countries. The WTO and OECD employ similar classification systems, generally addressing the same question and measuring the same programs. However, results can be surprisingly and fundamentally different, rendering comparisons inappropriate, meaningless, or even wrong. Careful attention to the sources of difference can prevent potential misunderstandings and misleading uses.
相关资源
- Evaluation of Agricultural Policy Reforms in the European Union: The Common Agricultural Policy 2014-20
- Agricultural Policy Monitoring and Evaluation 2013: OECD Countries and Emerging Economies
- Agricultural Policy Monitoring and Evaluation 2014: OECD Countries
- Agricultural Policy Monitoring and Evaluation 2017
- Agricultural Policy Monitoring and Evaluation 2018
- Agricultural Policy Monitoring and Evaluation 2016
- Agricultural Policy Monitoring and Evaluation
- Agricultural Policy Monitoring and Evaluation 2020
- Evaluation of Agricultural Policy Reforms in Japan
- Agricultural Progress in Cameroon, Ghana and Mali: Why it Happened and How to Sustain it
