Regulatory Capacity Review of Rwanda

• 查看报告

作者：

International Finance Corporation

来源地址：

http://hdl.handle.net/10986/27870

关键词：

ACCOUNTABILITY;  ACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISMS;  ADMINISTRATIVE BURDENS;  ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITIES;  ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY;  ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES;  ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS;  ADMINISTRATIVE SKILLS;  ADVISORY SERVICES;  ALTERNATIVES TO REGULATION;  AUDITOR GENERAL;  AUTHORITY;  BUDGETARY ALLOCATION;  BUSINESS LICENSING;  BUSINESS REGULATION;  BUSINESS REGULATIONS;  CABINET DECISION;  CABINET PROCESS;  CABINET PROCESSES;  CENTRAL GOVERNMENT;  CITIZENS;  CITIZENSHIP;  COLLECTIVE ACTION;  COLLECTIVE RESPONSIBILITY;  COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT;  COMPETITION POLICY;  COMPETITIVE MARKETS;  COMPETITORS;  COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATIONS;  CONSENSUS;  CONSTITUTION;  CONSULTATION;  CONSULTATION PROCEDURES;  CONSULTATIONS;  CORPORATE GOVERNANCE;  CORRUPTION;  CORRUPTION INDICATOR;  COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS;  COUNCILS;  CRIMINAL LAW;  DECENTRALIZATION;  DECENTRALIZATION ACTIVITIES;  DECENTRALIZATION PROCESS;  DECISION-MAKING;  DECISION-MAKING PROCESS;  DECREE;  DECREES;  DEMOCRATIC LOCAL GOVERNANCE;  DEMOCRATIC STATE;  DEMOCRATIZATION;  DISCLOSURE;  DISCRIMINATION;  DISTRICTS;  DRAFT LEGISLATION;  ECONOMIC ACTIVITY;  ECONOMIC CHANGE;  ECONOMIC COOPERATION;  ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT;  ECONOMIC GROWTH;  ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES;  ENFORCEMENT OF REGULATION;  ENFORCEMENT OF REGULATIONS;  EXECUTION;  EXECUTIVE COMMITTEES;  EXECUTIVE POWER;  EXPENDITURE;  FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS;  FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS;  FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT;  FINANCIAL RESOURCES;  FISCAL CONTROLS;  FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION;  FISCAL INCENTIVES;  FOREIGN AFFAIRS;  GOOD GOVERNANCE;  GOVERNMENT ACTION;  GOVERNMENT AGENCIES;  GOVERNMENT AGENCY;  GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS;  GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION;  GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS;  GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATIONS;  GOVERNMENT PERFORMANCE;  GOVERNMENT POLICIES;  GOVERNMENT POLICY;  GOVERNMENT PROGRAM;  GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS;  GOVERNMENT REVENUE;  GOVERNMENT REVENUES;  GOVERNMENT SERVICES;  GOVERNMENT STAKEHOLDERS;  GOVERNMENT STRATEGY;  GOVERNMENT'S POLICY;  GUIDELINES FOR REGULATORS;  HEADS OF STATE;  HUMAN RESOURCE;  HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT;  HUMAN RESOURCES;  INCOME TAX;  INFORMAL ECONOMY;  INFORMAL SECTOR;  INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY;  INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT;  INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS;  INVESTMENT CLIMATE;  JUDICIARY;  LABOR MARKET;  LABOR MARKET FLEXIBILITY;  LEGAL CHANGES;  LEGAL FRAMEWORK;  LEGAL INSTRUMENTS;  LEGAL REFORM;  LEGAL SERVICES;  LEGAL SYSTEM;  LEGISLATION;  LEGISLATIVE SUPREMACY;  LEGISLATURE;  LEGITIMACY;  LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT;  LOCAL AUTHORITIES;  LOCAL AUTHORITY;  LOCAL GOVERNMENT;  LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES;  LOCAL GOVERNMENTS;  MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK;  MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT;  MINISTER;  MINISTER OF STATE;  MINISTERS;  MINISTERS OF STATE;  MINISTRY OF FINANCE;  MUNICIPALITY;  NATIONAL LEVEL;  NATIONAL POLICIES;  POLICY FRAMEWORK;  POLICY GOALS;  POLICY INSTRUMENT;  POLICY INSTRUMENTS;  POLICY PREFERENCES;  POLICY PROPOSALS;  PRIVATE SECTOR INVESTMENT;  PRIVATIZATION OF STATE;  PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION;  PUBLIC AGENCIES;  PUBLIC CONSULTATION;  PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS;  PUBLIC INVESTMENT;  PUBLIC POLICIES;  PUBLIC SECTOR;  PUBLIC SERVICE;  PUBLIC SPENDING;  QUALITY REGULATION;  QUALITY REGULATIONS;  RATIONALIZATION;  REGULATORS;  REGULATORY AGENCIES;  REGULATORY ALTERNATIVES;  REGULATORY COMPLIANCE;  REGULATORY DEVELOPMENT;  REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT;  REGULATORY FRAMEWORK;  REGULATORY IMPACT;  REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS;  REGULATORY INSTRUMENTS;  REGULATORY MANAGEMENT;  REGULATORY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM;  REGULATORY POLICIES;  REGULATORY POLICY;  REGULATORY PROCESS;  REGULATORY PROCESSES;  REGULATORY PURPOSES;  REGULATORY REFORM;  REGULATORY REFORM EFFORTS;  REGULATORY REFORM POLICY;  REGULATORY REFORMS;  REGULATORY REGIME;  REGULATORY REGIMES;  REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS;  REGULATORY RESPONSIBILITIES;  REGULATORY SYSTEM;  REHABILITATION;  REPRESENTATIVES;  SENATE;  SOCIAL ASSESSMENT;  SOCIAL SECURITY;  STATE ENTERPRISES;  STATE INSTITUTIONS;  TAX INCENTIVES;  TAX RATES;  TRANSPARENCY;  TYPES OF REGULATION;  VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE;  VOTING;  Report; 

年份：

2010

出版地：

Washington,USA

语种：

English

摘要：

Regulatory reform has emerged as an important policy area in developing countries. For reforms to be beneficial, regulatory regimes need to be transparent, coherent, and comprehensive. They must establish appropriate institutional frameworks and liberalized business regulations; enforce competition policy and law; and open external and internal markets to trade and investment. This report analyses the institutional set-up and use of regulatory policy instruments in Rwanda. It is one of five reports prepared on countries in East and Southern Africa (the others are on Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania and Zambia), and represents an attempt to apply assessment tools and the framework developed by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) in its work on regulatory capacity and performance to developing countries.