Local Governance and Community Development Initiatives : Contributions for Community Development Programs in Timor-Leste

• 查看报告

作者：

Butterworth, David

来源地址：

http://hdl.handle.net/10986/27255

关键词：

ACCOUNTABILITY;  ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN;  AUTHORITY;  BLOCK GRANTS;  BUDGET EXECUTION;  CITIZEN;  CITIZEN PARTICIPATION;  CITIZENS;  CITIZENSHIP;  CIVIC EDUCATION;  CIVIL SOCIETY;  CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATION;  COMMUNITIES;  COMMUNITY CONSULTATION;  COMMUNITY DECISION MAKING;  COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT;  COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS;  COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE;  COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT;  COMMUNITY LEADERS;  COMMUNITY LEVEL;  COMMUNITY MEETINGS;  COMMUNITY MEMBERS;  COMMUNITY OWNERSHIP;  COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION;  COMMUNITY RESOURCES;  COMMUNITY-DRIVEN DEVELOPMENT;  CONSENSUS;  CONSULTATION;  CORRUPTION;  COUNCILS;  COUNTRYSIDE;  DATA COLLECTION;  DECENTRALIZATION;  DECENTRALIZATION PROCESS;  DECISION MAKING;  DECISION-MAKING;  DECISION-MAKING PROCESS;  DECISION-MAKING PROCESSES;  DECISIONMAKING;  DEMOCRACY;  DEMOCRATIC PRINCIPLES;  DEMOCRATIC RIGHTS;  DEMOCRATIC STATE;  DESCRIPTION;  DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATIONS;  DISTRICT;  DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION;  DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIONS;  DISTRICT ADMINISTRATOR;  DISTRICT ASSEMBLIES;  DISTRICT ASSEMBLY;  DISTRICT EDUCATION;  DISTRICT HEADQUARTERS;  DISTRICT LEVEL;  DISTRICT LEVELS;  DISTRICT OFFICES;  DISTRICT-LEVEL;  DISTRICTS;  ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT;  EMPLOYMENT GENERATION;  EXECUTION;  FACILITATORS;  FEMALE;  FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT;  FINANCIAL RESOURCES;  FINANCIAL SUPPORT;  GENDER;  GOOD GOVERNANCE;  GOVERNANCE ENVIRONMENT;  GOVERNANCE OBJECTIVES;  GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS;  GOVERNMENT STRUCTURES;  HOUSEHOLDS;  HOUSES;  HUMAN RESOURCES;  INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT;  KEY ACTORS;  KINGDOMS;  LEGITIMACY;  LIVING STANDARDS;  LOBBYING;  LOCAL AUTHORITIES;  LOCAL COMMUNITIES;  LOCAL COMMUNITY;  LOCAL GOVERNANCE;  LOCAL GOVERNMENT;  LOCAL INDUSTRY;  LOCAL KNOWLEDGE;  LOCAL LEVELS;  MERITOCRACY;  MINISTRY OF JUSTICE;  MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS;  MUNICIPALITIES;  NATIONAL POLICY;  NATIONS;  NATURAL RESOURCES;  OCCUPATION;  PAMPHLETS;  PARTICIPATORY APPROACHES;  PARTICIPATORY DEVELOPMENT;  PARTICIPATORY PLANNING;  POLITICAL PARTIES;  POLITICAL PARTY;  POLITICAL POWER;  POSTERS;  PRESIDENCY;  PRIMARY SCHOOL;  PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION;  PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION;  PUBLIC SECTOR;  PUBLIC SPENDING;  REFERENDUM;  REHABILITATION;  REVOLUTION;  RURAL COMMUNITIES;  RURAL DEVELOPMENT;  SERVICE DELIVERY;  SETTLEMENT;  SETTLEMENT PATTERNS;  SKILLED WORKERS;  SOCIAL CAPITAL;  SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT;  SOCIAL ORGANIZATION;  SOCIALLY SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;  STATE ADMINISTRATION;  STATE AUTHORITIES;  STATE AUTHORITY;  STATE BUDGET;  STATE INSTITUTIONS;  SUBDISTRICT OFFICIALS;  SUBNATIONAL;  SUBNATIONAL GOVERNMENTS;  SUBNATIONAL LEVELS;  TRADITIONAL LEADERS;  TRAININGS;  TRANSPARENCY;  VILLAGE;  VILLAGES;  VOTING;  YOUNG WOMEN;  YOUTH;  YOUTH DEVELOPMENT;  YOUTH REPRESENTATIVES;  Report; 

年份：

2011

出版地：

Washington,USA

语种：

English

摘要：

What happens when the state's vision and expanding reach bring it into contact with traditional value systems and governance structures? In what circumstances can the distribution of resources in a fragile society prevent-or exacerbate-conflict within and between communities? How do state expansion and public spending impact upon societal expectations of the state and state legitimacy? This report examines these questions through the lens of access, claiming, and decision making in government-sponsored community development programs. The findings illustrate the hurdles faced by government and development actors operating in pluralistic societies, and provide input on how local governance and decision making might be incorporated to enrich programming. This report aims to provide the government of Timor-Leste, particularly those responsible for decentralization, community development, and local governance planning, with information to inform their determination of an appropriate mix of models for local development. The relative priority the government will ultimately give to these different models, partly a trade-off between speed and depth, will impact on the way in which development and local governance are understood and taken on board by rural communities. This report finds that the achievement of the dual goals of state legitimacy and sustainable, effective local development hinges in large part on the willingness of state officials (and the donors that support them) to engage productively with communities and locally legitimate customary systems of authority.