Papua Public Expenditure Analysis

• 查看报告

作者：

World Bank

来源地址：

http://hdl.handle.net/10986/27234

关键词：

ACCOUNTABILITY;  ACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISMS;  ACCOUNTABILITY REQUIREMENTS;  ACCOUNTING;  AGRICULTURAL SECTOR;  ASSET MANAGEMENT;  BALANCE OF TRADE;  BANK OFFICE;  BUDGET ALLOCATION;  BUDGET ALLOCATIONS;  BUDGET BALANCE;  BUDGET IMPLEMENTATION;  BUDGET SURPLUS;  BUDGETING PROCESS;  CAPACITY BUILDING;  CAPACITY BUILDING ACTIVITIES;  CAPITAL EXPENDITURE;  CAPITAL FLOWS;  CAPITAL INVESTMENT;  CASH BUDGET;  CASH BUDGETS;  CASH MANAGEMENT;  CENTRAL GOVERNMENT;  CENTRAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES;  CENTRAL GOVERNMENTS;  CIVIL SERVANTS;  CIVIL SERVICE;  COMMODITY PRICES;  COMMUNITY HEALTH;  CONSUMPTION GOODS;  DEBT;  DISBURSEMENT;  DISBURSEMENTS;  DISTRICT;  DISTRICT FINANCING;  DISTRICT GOVERNMENT;  DISTRICT GOVERNMENTS;  DISTRICT LEVEL;  DISTRICT LEVELS;  DISTRICT-LEVEL;  DISTRICTS;  DOMESTIC CAPITAL;  DOMESTIC INVESTMENT;  ECONOMIC CLASSIFICATION;  ECONOMIC CONDITIONS;  ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT;  ECONOMIC GROWTH;  ECONOMIC GROWTH RATE;  ELECTRICITY;  EMPLOYEE;  ENROLLMENT;  ENROLMENT RATE;  EQUIPMENT;  EXPENDITURE ALLOCATION;  EXPENDITURE ANALYSIS;  EXPENDITURE CATEGORIES;  EXPENDITURE COMPOSITION;  EXPENDITURE GROWTH;  EXPENDITURE PATTERNS;  EXPENDITURE PER CAPITA;  EXPENDITURE PRIORITIES;  EXPENDITURES;  FINANCE INFORMATION SYSTEM;  FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION;  FINANCIAL COST;  FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT CAPACITY;  FINANCIAL REPORTS;  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS;  FISCAL AUTONOMY;  FISCAL CAPACITIES;  FISCAL CAPACITY;  FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION;  FISCAL RESOURCES;  FOREIGN CAPITAL;  FOREIGN INVESTMENT;  GENDER;  GOVERNMENT BUDGET;  GOVERNMENT BUDGETING;  GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURE;  GOVERNMENT REGULATION;  GOVERNMENT REVENUE;  GOVERNMENT REVENUES;  GOVERNMENT SPENDING;  GOVERNMENT STRUCTURE;  GOVERNOR;  GROWTH RATE;  HEALTH CENTERS;  HEALTH OUTCOMES;  HEALTH PROGRAMS;  HEALTH SECTOR;  HOLDING;  HOUSING;  HUMAN DEVELOPMENT;  HUMAN RESOURCES;  INCOME DISTRIBUTION;  INCOME GROUP;  INCOME GROUPS;  INCOME GROWTH;  INCOME LEVELS;  INFLATION;  INFLATION RATE;  INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT;  INFRASTRUCTURE EXPENDITURE;  INFRASTRUCTURE SECTOR;  INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRANSFERS;  INTERNAL CONTROL;  INTERNAL CONTROL SYSTEMS;  INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT;  INTERNATIONAL TRADE;  LACK OF TRANSPARENCY;  LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT;  LOCAL ECONOMIES;  LOCAL ECONOMY;  LOCAL GOVERNMENT;  LOCAL REVENUE;  LOCAL TAXES;  MASTER PLAN;  MEASURABLE INDICATORS;  MEDIUM-TERM DEVELOPMENT;  MEDIUM-TERM DEVELOPMENT PLANS;  MEDIUM-TERM PLANNING;  MINISTRY OF FINANCE;  MUNICIPALITIES;  MUNICIPALITY;  NATIONAL BUDGET;  NATIONAL BUDGETS;  NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT;  NATURAL RESOURCES;  OIL PRICE;  ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE;  ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURES;  PAYMENT OF PRINCIPAL;  PEOPLES;  PERSONNEL EXPENDITURE;  PERSONNEL EXPENSES;  PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT;  PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM;  POLITICIANS;  POVERTY RATE;  PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS;  PRIVATE PARTIES;  PRIVATE SECTOR;  PROGRAM MANAGEMENT;  PROGRAMS;  PROVINCE;  PROVINCES;  PROVINCIAL BUDGET;  PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT;  PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT LEVEL;  PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS;  PROVINCIAL LEVEL;  PUBLIC;  PUBLIC EXPENDITURE;  PUBLIC EXPENDITURE ANALYSIS;  PUBLIC FACILITIES;  PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT;  PUBLIC SERVICE;  PUBLIC SERVICES;  PUBLIC SPENDING;  PUBLIC WELFARE;  PUBLIC WORKS;  REAL GROWTH;  REFERENDUM;  REFORM AGENDA;  REGIONAL GOVERNMENT;  REGIONAL GOVERNMENTS;  REMOTE DISTRICTS;  RESERVE;  RESERVE FUNDS;  RESERVES;  RESOURCE MANAGEMENT;  REVENUE SHARING;  ROAD NETWORK;  ROADS;  SANITARY FACILITIES;  SANITATION;  SECTOR EXPENDITURE;  SECTORAL ALLOCATION;  SECTORAL ALLOCATIONS;  SECTORAL COMPOSITION;  SECTORAL EXPENDITURE;  SERVICE PROVISION;  SOCIAL ASSISTANCE;  SOCIAL PROTECTION;  SOCIAL WELFARE;  STOCK EXCHANGE;  STRATEGIC PLANS;  SUB-NATIONAL;  SUB-NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS;  TAX;  TAX COLLECTIONS;  TAX INCOME;  TAX REVENUE;  TAX REVENUE SHARING;  TAX REVENUES;  TECHNICAL SUPPORT;  TOTAL EXPENDITURE;  TOTAL HEALTH EXPENDITURE;  TOTAL SPENDING;  TRADE BALANCE;  TRANSACTION;  TRANSACTION COSTS;  TRANSPARENCY;  TREATY;  URBAN AREAS;  VILLAGE;  VILLAGES;  Report;  Rapport;  Informe; 

年份：

2011

出版地：

Washington,USA

语种：

English

摘要：

Papua has abundant natural and fiscal resources but also faces great development challenges. On the one hand, Papua currently has the largest per capita fiscal capacity after West Papua. Papua is rich in natural resources such as non-oil-and-gas minerals and forest products. On the other hand, development challenges in Papua are significant, including geography, terrain and demography. In general, Papua is still underdeveloped both socially and in economic terms compared to other regions in Indonesia. This underdevelopment is evident in most poverty, education, health, and infrastructure indicators. The economy and investment in Papua are dominated by the mining sector and, in a distant second place, the agricultural sector. Between 2004 and 2007, the mining sector accounted for more than 50 percent of the Papua's gross regional domestic product (GRDP). As a consequence, economic growth was determined by fluctuations in mineral commodity prices. The second largest sector is agriculture, which accounts for about 14-18 percent of GRDP. This sector absorbed the most workers in Papua province until 2008. Meanwhile, industry continues to lag and contributed less than 10 percent to GRDP. The PEA is a part of the PEACH (Public Expenditure Analysis and Capacity Harmonization) program. This program is an initiative of the Government of Papua to continuously improve its public financial management performance. Consequently, the analysis contained in this report addresses issues that are the region's main focus. Today, the Government of Papua is trying actively to achieve a 'New Papua' through implementing the following agenda: a) restructuring the local government; b) developing a prosperous Papua; c) developing a safe and peaceful Papua; and d) improving and accelerating the development of basic infrastructure and facilities.