Claim 1, characterized in that it comprises: a combination herbicide napropamide D -； and a Second herbicide that is more active against monocotyledonous Weeds Dicotyledonous Weeds.Claim 2: a combination according to claim 1, wherein the second herbicide Clomazone herbicide is selected, a urea, a triazine herbicide, herbicide TRIAZINONA, Hidroxibenzonitrilo, thiocarbamate herbicide, herbicide piridazi NA, cloroacetanilida Benzothiazole herbicide； herbicide； herbicidal carbanilate,Ciclohenexo Oximes herbicides and herbicide picol u00ednico acid Pyridine herbicides； herbicides； quinolincarbox u00edlico acid herbicides； clorotriazina, clorotriazina ariloxifenoxipropi u00f3nico herbicide, herbicide, herbicide oxadiazolonas； phenylurea herbicides, herbicides Sulfonanilida； triazolopirimidinas amide herbicide, herbicide, herbicide, pyridazines,Dinitroaniline herbicide, or combinations of these. Claim 3: a combination according to claim 2, wherein also comprises a third of Clomazone herbicide, herbicide cloroacetanilida pyrazole herbicides； herbicides； quinolincarbox u00edlico acid and amide herbicides.Claim 6: Use of napropamide wherein d is for the control of a Dicotyledonous weeds in a Locus. Claim 13: Use according to any of the preceding Claims, wherein the D - napropamide applies in such a quantity that is effective in controlling weeds and Dicotyledonous Plant still substantially inactive against the monocotyledons.Claim 15: a method to control Dicotyledonous Weeds as defined in any of Claims 6 and 9 to 11 in a Locus as defined in any of Claims 6 to 8, wherein the method comprises treating the locus with an amount of D - napropamide co N herbicidal effectiveness.Claim 19: a combination herbicide to control Dicotyledonous Weed infestation in a Locus, wherein the combination comprises an effective amount of D - and herbicide napropamide.Reivindicación 1: Una combinación herbicida caracterizada porque comprende D-Napropamida； y un segundo herbicida que es más activo co
